Cookies

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic.

We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.

Burning Sands Spy Reports (39-2)

Updated: 15 October 2014 

The following data is valid for commander without any equipment.
(Double checked and verified 100%)
According to your commander’s equipment, you may need less tools to attack.

 

Target’s Equipments Effects
Wall protection + 16 %
Gate protection + 15 %
Melee soldiers’ combat strength + 20 %
Ranged soldiers’ combat strength + 19 %

 

Flanks
Left 141% 120% 119% Melee defense = 9 , Ranged defense = 975 1
Center 110% 101% 120% 119% Melee defense = 9 , Ranged defense = 968
1          
Right 101% 120% 119% Melee defense = 9 , Ranged defense = 957  
Courtyard 120% 119% Melee defense = 9 , Ranged defense = 9259      

This is only a suggestion. There may be better attack formations, with fewer losses.

Recommended Attack Formation
  Left Center Right
1st wave  
2nd wave
  • 100% melee attackers
 
  • 100% melee attackers
3rd wave
  • 100% melee attackers
 
  • 100% melee attackers

 

4th wave      

3 comments to Burning Sands Spy Reports (39-2)

  • stargate67steve

    I won this level with only 1 wave, 40 melee (veterans) each flank with the same tools 14 ladders left, 10 ladders right.
    Commander with 43% melee.
    It’s just farmers no need 3 waves and so many tools.

    14 losses.

    • begar

      @stargate67steve

      I agree with you about the tools.

      But we need to send many soldiers, because someone has to bring back loot.

      • stargate67steve

        Usually  the loot comes from players, not Barons.
        The Barons is for coins, uniforms, and if the system allows rubins.
        And something else, for many players is very difficult to take recource villages espesially in Sand, or Peaks
        So they don’t have the oportunity for large army.

Leave a Reply